"There is talk in Sacramento about major budget cuts in transportation spending — and that has implications for the Expo Line. Work is now beginning on a light-rail system from downtown L.A. to Culver City. But transportation officials said cutbacks could hurt the chances of building Phase 2, from Culver City to Santa Monica. That could be bad news for Santa Monica. The city has already purchased land for a possible rail station."
As this snippet mentions, Phase I Expo Line has already started construction. Phase I will begin at the 7th Street Metro Station in downtown LA, heading south parallel to the Blue Line before breaking away west to connect with USC, Exposition Park, the neighborhoods of Crenshaw, Baldwin Hills, and La Brea before ending (temporarily, we hope) at the northern edge of Culver City near the start of the Ballona Creek bike path. fortunately, this phase of the Expo Line has funding in place, community support, and is set to go.

I can only support a project with such laudable goals as enhancing the connectivity of Los Angeles, reducing traffic congestion along the always busy east/west parking lot known as the I-10, and providing viable transportation options for those who either cannot afford to or morally oppose owning a personal automobile. So it frankly confounds me why the bureaucrats in Sacramento would rather fund highway expansions that let more people sit alone in their cars on the freeway than fund a mass transit option that enhances one of the most crowded commuter routes probably in the nation. The Expo Line will have millions of riders either way, but letting it hang out there half-finished would be a guffaw to rival the move in which Metro allowed the Green Line to not quite make it to the airport.
1 comment:
Good find! Sounds like the Auto Lobby is alive and well in California. :o/
Post a Comment